Major Revisions Underway for Quality-Education Standard (ISO 9001): What Educators Should Know
- OUS Academy in Switzerland
- Jun 19
- 2 min read
A wave of revisions to the flagship quality‑management standard—which underpins countless educational accreditation systems globally—is currently in progress. With the Draft International Standard (DIS) expected in June 2025, and full publication likely by late 2026, the educational sector must prepare for upcoming significant changes.
Review Timeline & Status
Following delays in previous cycles, the revision schedule is back on track:
DIS stage: expected June 2025
Final publication: second half of 2026
An earlier draft failed to meet editorial and technical requirements, prompting a second draft round and extended drafting period
Key Themes in the Revision
The refreshed standard will aim to reflect evolving educational practices and societal expectations. Anticipated focal areas include:
Enhanced Risk Management & Resilience
Educational entities will need to bolster proactive pandemic response mechanisms, digital infrastructure security, and crisis preparedness strategies
Sustainable Focus & Supply‑Chain Transparency
With sustainability rising in prominence, educational providers may be required to report on carbon footprint and integrate environmental reflection into procurement and program planning
Digital Transformation & Tech Integration
The revision will likely demand explicit tech-usage strategies—including data privacy, e‑learning integrity, and AI‑assisted assessments—as embedded elements of institutional quality processes
Stronger Supply‑Chain Reach
Requirements may now extend to third-party services such as outsourced training and digital platform providers, requiring verification that their outputs conform to institutional standards
Ethical Leadership & Stakeholder Engagement
More rigorous demand for ethical policies, transparency in decision‑making, and evidence of stakeholder consultation—affecting students, staff, families, and external partners
Descriptions indicate enhancements in these areas are being carefully shaped during the DIS drafting stage
Implications for Educational Providers
Gap Assessment: Institutions should promptly review current processes to locate mismatches with upcoming requirements.
Training & Competence: Staff development may need updating to handle new obligations in sustainability, risk, and tech governance.
Auditing & Documentation: Internal audit processes, policy documents, and records must be adjusted to meet the expanded scope.
Third‑Party Oversight: New vetting processes for outsourced services and suppliers will likely be essential.
Transition Period
Once published, organizations will typically have a three-year transition window to comply. That suggests educational bodies will need to complete transitions before 2029. However, delays in the schedule might alter this timeframe
Comments